1. Presentation and introduction class
1h30 of live class
2. Supervision
13h30 of live research encounters
Supervision, also referred to as control, has been one of the fundamental pillars of psychoanalytic practice since its inception. It is easy to show that a psychoanalyst cannot, under any circumstances, forgo this practice. This pillar, as we know, is closely linked to personal analysis and the ongoing training of the clinician. In this program, we invite students to experience this practice within the framework of a small group. This group supervision does not replace individual supervision, of course. However, it is a rich and fruitful modality that has existed since Freud. Each student will be part of a group that meets once a month. At each meeting, one of the members will present a clinical case that will serve as the basis for the supervision session. Each group will be accompanied by a professor or IIP member who will serve as the supervisor.
3. Research
13h30 of live research encounters
At the IIP, we consider research activity to be fundamental to the practice of psychoanalysis. Each person, from their own position, can and should participate—each in their own way and with their own style—in the advancement of psychoanalysis through this endeavor. We invite students in this formation to take part in a research group. This group will meet once a month and will be accompanied by a professor or IIP member. Within this small unit, each participant will be invited to develop a personal research question that will accompany them throughout the course of the formation. Everyone will also be invited to share within the group the current state of their individual research process.
Although this is an individual research project, it can only take place within a working community. That is the aim of this moment of formation.
4. Lacan, Back to the Future: implications of the topological paradigm
12h of live class
“Lacan, Back to the Future” proposes a temporal shift in psychoanalytic teaching, bringing to the clinic the current situation and the rupture represented by the “last Lacan” and the possible advances from him.
We propose an immersion in which the foundations of mathematical topology and the theoretical-clinical demands of psychoanalysis are intertwined in an unprecedented way.
The approach of the Borromean knot as a paradigm of psychic plasticity establishes the basis for understanding the dynamics of the Real, the Symbolic and the Imaginary.
The course methodology combines conceptual presentations and case analysis, integrating mathematical rigor and clinical sensitivity. In this way, participants learn to apply topology as an innovative tool, applying mathematical concepts to inaugurate listening practices that consider subjective complexity in all its plasticity.
Professors: Jed Wilson (USA), Marta Marciano (Brazil) & Mônica Godoy (Brazil)
5. Construction of clinical case
13h30 of live class
The construction of clinical case is a practice that is at the very heart of the history of Freudian discovery. This course is therefore part of this long tradition inseparable from the ethics of psychoanalysis. In this course, each month, one of the professors of the IIP will present in a narrow way a clinical situation resulting from his own analytic practice. It will be for him/her to show and demonstrate the possible construction of the case and extract from it his/hers own invention, between the structure and the singularity. Ample space will be reserved for discussion and debate following this clinical presentation.
Professors: Ceren Korulsan (Turkey), Dany Nobus (UK), Gabriel Tupinambá (Brazil), Jalil Bennani (Moroccos), Jaque Conceição (Brazil), Jed Wilson(USA), Marta Marciano (Brazil), Mônica Godoy (Brazil), Nicolas Tajan (France/Japan)
6. Psychoanalytic technique
13h30 of live classes
For the psychoanalyst, as for the artist, the problem of method articulates itself as a discourse on technique: not a codified set of procedures, but a living garland of questions, the fundamental paradoxes that each analyst must confront in their own way. In this seminar, we will put psychoanalysis itself into question; as a necessary consequence we will be put into question as well. From where in our being do we inaugurate the analytic function? How do we bring a rigorous reading to the case without violating the singularity that is at the heart of every analytic treatment? Down such avenues of curiosity and perplexity, we will pursue the essential ethical and epistemological problems of the practice of the psychoanalytic art.
Course schedule:
- On beginnings
- Maneuvering within the transference
- Reading the structure
- On repetition, fantasmatic and otherwise
- What does it mean to interpret?
- The question of online and hybrid treatment
- Analysis of children and adolescents
- Analysis of adults and elders
- On endings
Professor: Jed Wilson (USA)
7. The opening of Lacan's last seminars
13h30 of live classes
For several decades Jacques Lacan will provide a teaching, especially during his Seminar. He will say repeatedly: he does not seek to transmit a knowledge. His Seminar is a space for a psychoanalyst to say, in the position of an analysand.
Lacan closes his text “Psychoanalysis and its teaching” with the following words: “A return to Freud, which provides the material for a teaching worthy of the name, can only be produced by the pathway by which the most hidden truth manifests itself in the revolutions of culture. This pathway is the only training that I can claim to transmit to those who follow me. It is called: a style.”
Teaching: insignis in Latin; what is marked with a sign.
What sign and what style is this Seminar about?
To explore these questions, we propose to study rigorously during this year, at each month the first sentence(s) of a Seminar. We will start with the Seminar 20th and continue like this, chronologically, until the 27th. This proposal will certainly be the opportunity to trace a possible path within this teaching.
Professor: Benoît Le Bouteiller (France/Brazil)